More teams, more goals and bigger gaps?More teams, more goals and bigger gaps?

Expanded World Cup delivers record numbers

The 2026 World Cup, the first to feature 48 teams, concluded with a record 308 goals before Spain claimed the championship. The tournament, which included 104 games across three host countries, was notable not only for its increased size but also for its broader geographical demands and the age profile of its participating teams. Data analysis indicates that the average gap in FIFA rankings between opposing teams reached a new high, and the average age of starting elevens was the oldest on record for the competition.

The expansion of the tournament led to a significant increase in the number of goals scored. The average goal ratio stood at 2.96 per game, making it the second-highest since 1966, comparable to the 1970 World Cup. This surge in goals is partly attributed to the greater disparity in team quality, with an average 27.3-rank gap between opponents, the largest recorded. Historically, a wider rank disparity often correlates with higher scorelines.

Higher-ranked teams achieved a 66.3 per cent win rate, one of the highest since FIFA introduced its world rankings in 1992. Despite this, there were notable upsets. Lower-ranked teams secured wins in 14.4 per cent of games, with only four upset victories involving teams ranked 20 or more places below their opponents. Significant draws included Ghana’s 0-0 match against England, Cape Verde’s goalless draw with Spain, and New Zealand’s 2-2 draw against Iran.

Older teams and extensive travel challenges

The 2026 World Cup featured the oldest average starting XI age in the tournament’s history. The average age for a starting lineup was 28 years and 132 days, a figure that has been gradually increasing since 1966. Teams like Iran, Cape Verde, and Colombia all had average starting XIs exceeding 30 years of age.

Beyond age, the tournament presented significant logistical challenges due to its spread across three countries. England covered an estimated 25,609 kilometres in return journeys between base camps and stadiums, making them the team with the most travel. Spain followed closely with 24,314 km. In contrast, co-hosts Mexico traveled only 991 km, averaging 198 km per game.

Teams also contended with high temperatures, humidity, and altitude. For instance, the Azteca Stadium in Mexico City, at 2,245m above sea level, saw fewer high-speed runs than expected despite its sub-20-degree average temperature. Hydration breaks became a regular feature, turning some matches into four-part contests and offering coaches tactical reset points. Data suggests lower-ranked teams often benefited more from these breaks, while higher-ranked teams sometimes struggled to maintain dominance in the 10 minutes following a hydration time-out.

Which trends defined the 2026 World Cup?
Image:Which trends defined the 2026 World Cup? Credit: skysports.com

Set-pieces, substitutes, and future expansion

Set-pieces played a crucial role in the tournament, accounting for one in four goals scored, with corners contributing to half of these. Bosnia and Herzegovina were particularly reliant on set-pieces, with three of their five goals coming from dead-ball situations. Argentina and England were also significant beneficiaries, each scoring seven set-piece goals.

The impact of substitutes was also notable, with one-fifth of all goals scored by players coming off the bench. Substitutes scored in 44 of the 104 games. Belgium exemplified this in the knockout stage, with five of their 14 goals originating from substitutes, including three from Romelu Lukaku. Spain’s Ferran Torres, a substitute, scored the match-winning goal in the final.

Looking ahead, discussions are underway regarding a further expansion of the World Cup to 64 teams for the 2030 tournament. This idea was proposed by South American football leaders, and FIFA President Gianni Infantino has indicated it will be considered. The 2030 World Cup is already set to be hosted across six countries on three continents: Spain, Portugal, and Morocco as principal hosts, with one-off games in Uruguay, Argentina, and Paraguay to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the finals. Critics have expressed concerns that further expansion could dilute the tournament’s quality, similar to views before the 48-team expansion. However, a larger format is expected to generate more revenue.

Preparations for the 2030 World Cup are already in progress, with stadium construction and upgrades across the host nations. Morocco, for instance, is building the Hassan II Stadium, which is projected to seat 115,000, potentially making it the largest football stadium globally. Spain and Portugal are also upgrading existing venues and constructing new ones to accommodate the expanded tournament, with Barcelona’s Camp Nou set to become Europe’s biggest football stadium upon completion next year.

The 2026 World Cup has been a financial windfall for Fifa. AFP
The 2026 World Cup has been a financial windfall for Fifa. AFP Credit: thenationalnews.com

The 2026 World Cup champions, Spain, demonstrated a balanced approach amidst the tournament’s unique challenges, conceding a record-low one goal throughout the competition.

Source: skysports.com

Avatar photo

By Kwame Ofori

Kwame follows politics and current affairs, with a focus on Accra and national government.